Leapwork vs Accelq

Leapwork vs Accelq

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the competitive landscape of test automation platforms, Leapwork and Accelq stand out with their no-code, AI-powered capabilities designed to simplify the testing process. While both cater to a variety of industries and enable testing across web, Android, and iOS platforms, Leapwork is renowned for its ease of creating reusable components and its visual language.

On the other hand, Accelq boasts on-premise deployment, device farm integration, and specialized tools for a comprehensive testing suite. Understanding the nuanced differences between these platforms is key to choosing the right solution for your automation needs.

Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Leapwork and Accelq

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros – Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
Efficiency and Speed: ACCELQ offers a streamlined testing process that enhances overall efficiency and speed.
Self-Healing Capabilities: The tool has self-healing features that help maintain test accuracy over time.
Improved Test Coverage: Users report that ACCELQ helps in achieving more comprehensive test coverage.
Object Repository: A centralized object repository aids in better test management and reusability.
Defined Framework: ACCELQ comes with a predefined framework that reduces setup time and effort.
Logging Features: Detailed logging capabilities are available for better tracking and debugging of tests.
Defined Methods: The tool provides predefined methods that can be used to streamline test creation.
Salesforce Automation: It is particularly strong in automating tests for Salesforce applications.
Easy Maintenance: Maintenance of tests is easier due to the tool’s design and features.
Accelerated Development: Advanced AI capabilities in ACCELQ support faster development of test cases.
Review Cons – Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.
Java Integration: The need for an in-built editor for Java integrations to custom methods is an area for improvement.
Desktop UI Issues: Some users encounter issues with the Desktop UI, although alternatives like CLI are available.
Grid Filters: There is a need for enhancements in Grid Filters to support custom and diverse filter items.
Data Warehouse Integration: For those dealing with heterogeneous data sources, there may be challenges without a centralized data warehouse.
ETL Testing Limitations: While ACCELQ simplifies ETL testing, there may be complexities when dealing with varied data transformations and compliance standards.
Learning Curve: New users might experience a learning curve due to the advanced features and AI capabilities.
Cost: The pricing model may be a consideration for smaller teams or individual users.
Limited Language Support: Users who prefer programming languages other than Java may find limited support.
Customization Limits: Some users may require more customization options than what is currently available.
Documentation and Support: While not always the case, some users might seek more comprehensive documentation and support for complex scenarios.

Pricing Overview of Leapwork and ACCELQ

Leapwork Pricing Description

Leapwork Test Automation provides a flexible pricing model tailored to meet the specific needs of different business sizes and team configurations. Given the customizable nature of their pricing options, Leapwork does not offer set plans or pricing tiers on their website. Instead, they encourage potential customers to engage in a direct conversation to receive a personalized quote. This bespoke pricing strategy is designed to align with the customer’s unique business goals and the functionality required by their automation teams.

ACCELQ Pricing Description

ACCELQ presents a multi-faceted pricing structure that serves a wide array of test automation needs. It includes various plans that cater to testing across web, mobile, API, and manual testing environments, each equipped with distinct features like no-code logic editors and self-healing test capabilities. ACCELQ allows potential users to trial their plans, which are available for both cloud and on-premise deployment. For larger organizations, ACCELQ has an Enterprise Plan that offers additional advanced features and requires engagement with the ACCELQ team for custom pricing. For manual testing, ACCELQ provides individual and team plans, including a free-for-life option, with consistent support and operational features across all tiers.

Comparing the Pricing Models

When comparing the pricing models of Leapwork and ACCELQ, several commonalities and differences become apparent:

Common Points:

  • Customized Pricing: Both Leapwork and ACCELQ emphasize the importance of customized pricing. They offer personalized quotes for their services, especially for larger teams and enterprise-level requirements.
  • Direct Engagement for Quotes: In both cases, potential customers are encouraged to contact the companies directly to discuss pricing, underscoring a customer-centric approach that aims to understand and meet the specific needs of each organization.
  • Enterprise Options: Each platform caters to larger organizations by providing enterprise plans that can be customized and include advanced features.


  • Pricing Transparency: Unlike Leapwork, which does not disclose any pricing tiers upfront, ACCELQ provides information about different plans and includes a free-for-life option for manual testing, indicating a degree of pricing transparency.
  • Plan Variety: ACCELQ offers a variety of predefined plans with specific features for different types of testing (web, mobile, API), making it easier for companies to start with a base plan before potentially seeking customization. Leapwork, on the other hand, requires direct engagement before revealing any plan details.
  • Free Options: ACCELQ provides a free-for-life plan for manual testing, which is particularly attractive for individuals or small teams on a tight budget or those wishing to test the platform before committing financially. Leapwork does not mention any free or trial options, focusing instead on a completely tailored pricing approach.
  • Deployment Options: ACCELQ explicitly states the availability of their plans for both cloud and on-premise deployment, offering flexibility to businesses with different IT infrastructures. Leapwork does not provide this detail in the short description, so it is unclear whether they offer similar deployment options without further inquiry.

In summary, both Leapwork and ACCELQ offer personalized pricing models targeting a range of business sizes and needs, with a particular emphasis on serving enterprise clients. ACCELQ’s pricing structure is more transparent with a variety of plans and a free option, while Leapwork opts for a fully customized approach, requiring direct contact for pricing details.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!