31 January 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the bustling realm of software testing, Katalon and Waldo emerge as prominent platforms. Katalon is a comprehensive quality management suite with AI-enhanced features for web and mobile testing, suitable for various industries and team sizes, and offers a moderate ease of use.
Conversely, Waldo, part of Tricentis, provides a no-code, user-friendly mobile test automation solution, catering to both technical and non-technical users. While both platforms offer no-code automation and report generation, Katalon extends its capabilities with AI-augmented regression testing, whereas Waldo focuses on streamlining mobile app testing with an intuitive interface.
Latest update: 1/29/2024, 3:34:32 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Katalon and Waldo
Feature | Katalon | Waldo |
---|---|---|
Free Plan | ✔ | ✔ |
On Premise | ✔ | – |
Device Farm | ✔ | ✔ |
Scheduler | ✔ | – |
No Code | ✔ | ✔ |
Uses Ai | ✔ | – |
Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
Uses Computer Vision | ✔ | ✔ |
Platforms | web,Android,iOS | Android,iOS |
Ease Of Use | easy to learn | very easy to learn |
Is Open Source | – | – |
Support Included | ✔ | ✔ |
Review Pros |
– Reduced Effort in Test Maintenance: Users report that Katalon simplifies the creation and maintenance of reusable methods, which can reduce time and effort significantly. – Built-in Reporting Features: The platform automatically captures snapshots on test failures, which enhances the efficiency of reporting. – Comprehensive Test Features: Offers features like Record, Object Spy, and Frame Handling, which streamline the testing process. – Low Learning Curve: Katalon is accessible to manual testers, allowing them to transition to automation testing with minimal training. – Cross-Functional Testing Support: It supports UI, API, and Mobile testing within a single platform, reducing the need to manage different tools for different types of testing. – Community and Customer Support: There is strong community support for the free version and dedicated customer support for the paid version. – Facilitates Cross-Functional Roles: Enables testers to handle both manual and automated testing, effectively becoming cross-functional team members. – CI/CD Integration: For those who opt for the paid version, it offers Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment integration. – Codeless Automation: Provides a codeless automation option, making it accessible for teams with limited coding knowledge. – Efficiency in Test Execution: Users find that Katalon allows for faster test execution compared to manual testing, enabling more extensive and frequent testing. |
1. Tests from a real user’s perspective, making it less sensitive to UI changes. 2. Finds elements even if they change position, ID, or size, leading to more successful test completions. 3. Assertion feature alerts when changes are detected that may need review. 4. Includes a flakiness score to identify and improve flaky tests. 5. Advanced features like deep linking and branch testing enhance testing capabilities. 6. Contributes to faster and more efficient development cycles by catching bugs earlier. 7. Allows for confidence in releasing new updates without full manual regression. 8. Scalable and reliable technology that mimics real user interactions. 9. Excellent customer support with proactive outreach and dedicated communication channels. 10. Reduces manual testing time significantly, allowing for faster feedback loops and quicker bug fixes. |
Review Cons |
– Separate Licensing: Some users find the need for separate licenses for different features to be a disadvantage. – Cost for Advanced Features: Advanced features like CI/CD integration and Visual Testing require a paid license. – Mobile Execution Issues: There have been reports of instability during mobile test execution, where sessions unexpectedly close. – High Resource Usage: Users with less powerful hardware have experienced performance issues, indicating the platform may require substantial system resources. – Lack of Support for Legacy Systems: Katalon currently does not support automation testing for legacy Java UIs, which can be a limitation for some organizations. – Limited TestOps Analytics: The free version has limitations on the analytical results available through TestOps, pushing users towards the paid version for full functionality. – Separate Licensing for Cloud Features: Features like Parallel Cloud Execution and Cloud Tunnelling require additional licensing, which can increase costs. – Limited Free Features: Some users feel that the most valuable features are locked behind the paid version, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or individual users. – Hardware Demands: The platform’s demand on hardware resources can lead to slower performance on less capable machines. – No Bundled Packages: Users would prefer bundled packages for the various Katalon products to simplify licensing and possibly reduce costs. |
1. Continuous evolution of the product can require frequent adaptation of testing methods. 2. Some users experience slower execution speed of test suites. 3. Edge cases may be challenging to automate with the current toolset. 4. No-code approach may lead to updating tests only after new code breaks them. 5. Learning curve associated with adopting new developer tools like Waldo. 6. Can’t automate 100% of tests, as certain scenarios may still require manual attention. 7. End-to-end tests, particularly on mobile, can be inherently slow. 8. Dependency on the tool’s updates and improvements for better performance. 9. Some initial setup and familiarization with the technology are necessary. 10. May not be as intuitive for teams accustomed to traditional code-first testing approaches. |
Pricing Models of Katalon and Waldo
Katalon Pricing Overview
Katalon provides a tiered pricing strategy for its Software Quality Management Platform, catering to various team sizes and needs. The options include:
- Starter Plan: Free, targeting small teams or beginners with basic test automation capabilities.
- Premium Plan: $167/month (billed annually), offering professional-level test creation and dynamic testing workflows.
- Ultimate Plan: Custom pricing for enterprise-grade features.
Katalon emphasizes savings with annual billing, offering up to 25% off. Package deals and discounts for new customers are also available.
Waldo Pricing Overview
Waldo presents a customized testing plans framework:
- Free Manual Testing Option: For quick manual app interactions.
- Release Plan: Features fully automated end-to-end testing with single concurrency.
- Develop Plan: Offers expanded testing with multi-concurrency support for various languages and devices.
Waldo plans include a suite of features with all subscriptions, and advanced features are available to boost testing efficiency.
Comparison of Pricing Models
When comparing Katalon and Waldo, several common points and differences in their pricing models become apparent:
Common Points
- Tiered Plans: Both offer multiple pricing tiers, designed to accommodate different user needs and project scales.
- Free Options: Each provides a free plan, allowing users to engage with the platform before committing financially.
- Annual Savings: Committing to annual billing with Katalon yields savings, similar to the implied longer-term engagement benefits with Waldo.
- Feature Gradation: Higher plans include more advanced features and capabilities, following a standard industry practice.
Differences
- Pricing Transparency: Katalon has clear pricing for its Premium plan, whereas Waldo requires potential customers to engage with a demo to understand the full scope and potential costs.
- Custom Pricing: Katalon’s Ultimate plan requires a custom quote, which is not explicitly stated for any of Waldo’s plans.
- Enterprise Focus: Katalon’s Ultimate plan is specifically tailored for enterprise needs, which is not directly matched in Waldo’s offerings.
- Package Deals: Katalon offers package deals and discounts for new customers, a marketing strategy not mentioned by Waldo.
- Testing Focus: Katalon supports a broader range of testing including web, API, mobile, and desktop, with AI-powered and visual testing options. Waldo seems to focus more on automated end-to-end testing solutions.
- Support for Concurrency: Waldo’s Develop plan emphasizes multi-concurrency testing, a feature not specifically highlighted by Katalon.
In summary, while both Katalon and Waldo offer structured pricing models with free entry points and tiered features, their differences lie in the specifics of plan pricing, enterprise targeting, and the scope of testing capabilities. Katalon provides a more transparent and diverse range of plans, including deals and discounts, whereas Waldo emphasizes the efficiency and enhancement of automated testing with advanced features included across plans.