Katalon vs Swift Snapshot Testing

Katalon vs Swift Snapshot Testing

31 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

Choosing the right testing platform can greatly impact your software development workflow. Katalon offers a comprehensive quality management platform with AI-augmented and visual testing capabilities, suitable for web and mobile platforms.


It’s designed for teams seeking a balance between no-code and full-code options, with robust reporting and scheduling features. On the other hand, Swift Snapshot Testing is a focused library for iOS that streamlines snapshot testing within XCTest, perfect for developers who need a lightweight, code-driven tool. Understanding the differences in platform support, ease of use, and the balance between codeless automation and technical configuration is key to selecting the best tool for your needs.


Latest update: 1/29/2024, 3:34:32 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of Katalon and Swift Snapshot Testing

FeatureKatalonSwift Snapshot Testing
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Scheduler
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Platformsweb,Android,iOSiOS
Ease Of Useeasy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review ProsReduced Effort in Test Maintenance: Users report that Katalon simplifies the creation and maintenance of reusable methods, which can reduce time and effort significantly.
Built-in Reporting Features: The platform automatically captures snapshots on test failures, which enhances the efficiency of reporting.
Comprehensive Test Features: Offers features like Record, Object Spy, and Frame Handling, which streamline the testing process.
Low Learning Curve: Katalon is accessible to manual testers, allowing them to transition to automation testing with minimal training.
Cross-Functional Testing Support: It supports UI, API, and Mobile testing within a single platform, reducing the need to manage different tools for different types of testing.
Community and Customer Support: There is strong community support for the free version and dedicated customer support for the paid version.
Facilitates Cross-Functional Roles: Enables testers to handle both manual and automated testing, effectively becoming cross-functional team members.
CI/CD Integration: For those who opt for the paid version, it offers Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment integration.
Codeless Automation: Provides a codeless automation option, making it accessible for teams with limited coding knowledge.
Efficiency in Test Execution: Users find that Katalon allows for faster test execution compared to manual testing, enabling more extensive and frequent testing.
N/A
Review ConsSeparate Licensing: Some users find the need for separate licenses for different features to be a disadvantage.
Cost for Advanced Features: Advanced features like CI/CD integration and Visual Testing require a paid license.
Mobile Execution Issues: There have been reports of instability during mobile test execution, where sessions unexpectedly close.
High Resource Usage: Users with less powerful hardware have experienced performance issues, indicating the platform may require substantial system resources.
Lack of Support for Legacy Systems: Katalon currently does not support automation testing for legacy Java UIs, which can be a limitation for some organizations.
Limited TestOps Analytics: The free version has limitations on the analytical results available through TestOps, pushing users towards the paid version for full functionality.
Separate Licensing for Cloud Features: Features like Parallel Cloud Execution and Cloud Tunnelling require additional licensing, which can increase costs.
Limited Free Features: Some users feel that the most valuable features are locked behind the paid version, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or individual users.
Hardware Demands: The platform’s demand on hardware resources can lead to slower performance on less capable machines.
No Bundled Packages: Users would prefer bundled packages for the various Katalon products to simplify licensing and possibly reduce costs.
N/A


Pricing Model Comparison: Katalon vs. Swift Snapshot Testing

Katalon Pricing Overview

Katalon presents a tiered pricing model for its Software Quality Management Platform, accommodating a range of team sizes and testing requirements. The model includes:

  • Starter Plan: Free, offering basic test automation features for small teams or beginners.
  • Premium Plan: $167 per month (billed annually), providing professional test creation and dynamic workflows.
  • Ultimate Plan: Custom pricing for enterprise-grade capabilities.

Katalon emphasizes savings with annual billing, up to 25% off, and provides package deals and discounts for new customers. The platform is comprehensive, supporting web, API, mobile, and desktop testing, and includes AI and visual testing options.

Swift Snapshot Testing Pricing Overview

Swift Snapshot Testing operates on a different model:

  • Free Open Source Software: Entirely free, allowing users to leverage snapshot testing without any cost.

Comparison of Pricing Models

Common Points

The fundamental commonality between Katalon and Swift Snapshot Testing is the provision of a free option:

  • Katalon’s Starter Plan: Free access with basic features.
  • Swift Snapshot Testing: Completely free as it is open-source software.

Both models cater to users or teams that are budget-conscious or in the initial phases of integrating testing into their development cycles.

Key Differences

The divergence in their pricing models is significant, with Katalon offering a more traditional software-as-a-service (SaaS) tiered pricing structure, while Swift Snapshot Testing adopts an open-source model. Here are the primary distinctions:

  • Complexity and Features: Katalon’s paid plans introduce more advanced features and support, aligning with professional and enterprise needs. Swift Snapshot Testing is free and may have more limited features and support compared to Katalon’s paid options.
  • Cost Implications: With Katalon, ongoing costs are associated with the premium offerings, which can be significant for larger teams requiring advanced features. Swift Snapshot Testing, being open-source, incurs no direct costs, potentially offering savings over time, especially for teams capable of self-support.
  • Customization and Support: Katalon provides structured support and updates, particularly at the Ultimate tier with custom pricing. In contrast, Swift Snapshot Testing relies on the community for support and updates, which can be beneficial for teams with open-source experience.
  • Licensing and Discounts: Katalon offers clear licensing options with package deals and discounts for new customers. Swift Snapshot Testing does not have a licensing structure, removing the need for dealing with licenses or seeking discounts.
  • Long-term Commitment: Katalon encourages annual commitments with its pricing discounts, while Swift Snapshot Testing, as open-source software, allows for flexibility without any commitment.

In summary, Katalon is suited for teams looking for a scalable, feature-rich platform with structured support and are willing to invest financially. Swift Snapshot Testing, on the other hand, is ideal for teams or individuals seeking a no-cost solution with the technical know-how to leverage open-source software.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.