Katalon vs Sofy

Katalon vs Sofy

31 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the ever-evolving landscape of software testing, Katalon and Sofy emerge as two proficient platforms designed to streamline quality assurance. Katalon is a versatile quality management platform integrating AI-augmented testing and visual testing capabilities, suitable for web and mobile applications, and offers a moderate learning curve.


On the other hand, Sofy specializes as a no-code mobile app testing platform that leverages AI for test case generation, priding itself on high ease-of-use and access to real devices for testing. Both platforms utilize AI and offer robust reporting, but differ in their approach to codeless automation and platform support.


Latest update: 1/29/2024, 3:34:32 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of Katalon and Sofy

FeatureKatalonSofy
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Scheduler
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
Platformsweb,Android,iOSAndroid,iOS
Ease Of Useeasy to learnvery easy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review ProsReduced Effort in Test Maintenance: Users report that Katalon simplifies the creation and maintenance of reusable methods, which can reduce time and effort significantly.
Built-in Reporting Features: The platform automatically captures snapshots on test failures, which enhances the efficiency of reporting.
Comprehensive Test Features: Offers features like Record, Object Spy, and Frame Handling, which streamline the testing process.
Low Learning Curve: Katalon is accessible to manual testers, allowing them to transition to automation testing with minimal training.
Cross-Functional Testing Support: It supports UI, API, and Mobile testing within a single platform, reducing the need to manage different tools for different types of testing.
Community and Customer Support: There is strong community support for the free version and dedicated customer support for the paid version.
Facilitates Cross-Functional Roles: Enables testers to handle both manual and automated testing, effectively becoming cross-functional team members.
CI/CD Integration: For those who opt for the paid version, it offers Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment integration.
Codeless Automation: Provides a codeless automation option, making it accessible for teams with limited coding knowledge.
Efficiency in Test Execution: Users find that Katalon allows for faster test execution compared to manual testing, enabling more extensive and frequent testing.
– The support team is highly responsive and provides solid assistance.
– Mobile testing capabilities are particularly strong.
– Enables creation of test data and handling conditional logic through a record-and-play feature.
– Integration with JIRA and CI/CD pipelines enhances workflow.
– Facilitates rapid increase in test coverage.
– The ability to make API requests within tests allows for more comprehensive testing scenarios.
– Described as a user-friendly no-code solution, making it accessible for startups and non-developers.
– Encourages best practices in test writing through collaboration with a technical account manager.
– Supports testing on real devices and can connect to other devices via Bluetooth.
– Actively listens to customer feedback and regularly introduces new, helpful features.
Review ConsSeparate Licensing: Some users find the need for separate licenses for different features to be a disadvantage.
Cost for Advanced Features: Advanced features like CI/CD integration and Visual Testing require a paid license.
Mobile Execution Issues: There have been reports of instability during mobile test execution, where sessions unexpectedly close.
High Resource Usage: Users with less powerful hardware have experienced performance issues, indicating the platform may require substantial system resources.
Lack of Support for Legacy Systems: Katalon currently does not support automation testing for legacy Java UIs, which can be a limitation for some organizations.
Limited TestOps Analytics: The free version has limitations on the analytical results available through TestOps, pushing users towards the paid version for full functionality.
Separate Licensing for Cloud Features: Features like Parallel Cloud Execution and Cloud Tunnelling require additional licensing, which can increase costs.
Limited Free Features: Some users feel that the most valuable features are locked behind the paid version, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or individual users.
Hardware Demands: The platform’s demand on hardware resources can lead to slower performance on less capable machines.
No Bundled Packages: Users would prefer bundled packages for the various Katalon products to simplify licensing and possibly reduce costs.
– Some users may find the product’s capabilities limited for cutting-edge or unique test cases.
– Web testing features are not as robust as mobile testing features.
– Issues with JIRA integration have been reported.
– The platform may require a learning curve and initial setup effort to integrate with existing CI flows.
– Test execution speed has been reported as somewhat slow by some users.
– Uses a minute-based pricing system, which may not suit all types of projects or budgets.
– Some users find the overall pricing to be on the higher side.
– Requires effort to automate test cases and connect physical devices via Bluetooth, despite the ease of use.
– The product is still growing and may not have all the desired features yet.
– Requires some technical effort to fully integrate test results with other continuous integration flows.


Comparative Analysis of Katalon and Sofy Pricing Models

Katalon Pricing Overview

Katalon’s pricing strategy is designed to accommodate a range of team sizes and testing needs. It offers a tiered pricing model which includes:

  • A Starter Plan that is free of charge, suitable for small teams or beginners in test automation.
  • The Premium Plan at $167 per month (when billed annually), targeting professional teams with advanced test creation and dynamic workflows.
  • The Ultimate Plan which provides enterprise-grade features and requires custom pricing based on the specific needs.
    Katalon encourages annual billing with up to 25% savings and provides package deals and discounts for new customers to enhance affordability.

Sofy Pricing Overview

Sofy’s pricing model also features different tiers to serve various organizational requirements:

  • The Starter Plan costs $549 per month with an annual contract, offering essential tools and features like 2500 real device minutes and 2 parallel device sessions.
  • The Pro Plan is priced at $1499 per month, including 7500 real device minutes and 5 parallel sessions, catering to more demanding QA processes.
  • Custom Enterprise Solutions are available, with pricing determined through consultation, tailored to complex and large-scale needs.
    Sofy’s plans all include a set of core features with the option for a free trial before commitment.

Common Points and Key Differences

When comparing the pricing models of Katalon and Sofy, several commonalities and differences are evident:

Commonalities:

  • Both offer tiered pricing structures designed to cater to different team sizes and requirements.
  • Annual billing options are available, which provide cost savings over month-to-month payments.
  • Each has a free option; Katalon with its Starter Plan and Sofy with its free trial.
  • Both provide package deals or custom pricing for enterprise-level needs.

Differences:

  • Entry-Level Pricing: Katalon’s entry-level starter plan is free, while Sofy’s starts at $549 per month with an annual contract.
  • Cost of Professional Plans: Katalon’s Premium Plan is more affordable at $167 per month (billed annually) compared to Sofy’s Pro Plan at $1499 per month.
  • Real Device Minutes and Parallel Sessions: Sofy explicitly offers real device minutes and parallel device sessions, which are pivotal for teams needing extensive device testing.
  • Enterprise Customization: While both offer custom solutions for enterprises, Sofy emphasizes tailored device minutes, sessions, and SSO options.
  • Discounts and Trials: Katalon provides special discounts for new customers, while Sofy offers a free trial period for users to test their platform.

In summary, Katalon’s model is more accessible for smaller teams or those just starting with automation, with a free starter plan and more affordable premium options. On the other hand, Sofy’s model, with its higher entry price point, seems tailored towards teams that require extensive testing on real devices from the get-go. Both platforms scale up to enterprise needs, but their approaches and pricing reflect different core audiences and usage scenarios.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.