Katalon vs Bitbar

Katalon vs Bitbar

31 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the bustling realm of software testing, Katalon and Bitbar emerge as prominent solutions, each with its distinct advantages. Katalon is a versatile quality management platform, offering AI-powered testing, cross-functional support, and a balance of low-code and no-code capabilities, ideal for teams seeking comprehensive testing features with moderate ease of use.

On the flip side, Bitbar specializes in cloud-based testing across a vast array of real devices and browsers, emphasizing scalability and no-code convenience, catering to organizations that prioritize flexible deployment options and extensive device coverage. Understanding the nuances between these platforms is key to optimizing your testing strategy.

Latest update: 1/29/2024, 3:34:32 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Katalon and Bitbar

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Ease Of Useeasy to learneasy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review ProsReduced Effort in Test Maintenance: Users report that Katalon simplifies the creation and maintenance of reusable methods, which can reduce time and effort significantly.
Built-in Reporting Features: The platform automatically captures snapshots on test failures, which enhances the efficiency of reporting.
Comprehensive Test Features: Offers features like Record, Object Spy, and Frame Handling, which streamline the testing process.
Low Learning Curve: Katalon is accessible to manual testers, allowing them to transition to automation testing with minimal training.
Cross-Functional Testing Support: It supports UI, API, and Mobile testing within a single platform, reducing the need to manage different tools for different types of testing.
Community and Customer Support: There is strong community support for the free version and dedicated customer support for the paid version.
Facilitates Cross-Functional Roles: Enables testers to handle both manual and automated testing, effectively becoming cross-functional team members.
CI/CD Integration: For those who opt for the paid version, it offers Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment integration.
Codeless Automation: Provides a codeless automation option, making it accessible for teams with limited coding knowledge.
Efficiency in Test Execution: Users find that Katalon allows for faster test execution compared to manual testing, enabling more extensive and frequent testing.
– Extensive support for cross-browser testing, allowing for quick identification of bugs.
– Ability to take screenshots and record tests when a test case fails, enhancing the debugging process.
– Offers a Record & Play feature which is highly valued by users.
– User-friendly interface that supports a large number of browsers, making it easy to test across different environments.
– Positive feedback on the tool’s reliability with no significant dislikes reported by some users.
– Simplifies site updates and cross-browser compatibility checks for multiple clients.
– Provides a wide range of systems and devices for testing purposes.
– Enables efficient automation of testing across various devices and operating systems.
– Cost-effective, with the tool’s efficiency offsetting the expense through time savings.
– Effective dashboard that provides a quick and concise overview of testing status and results.
Review ConsSeparate Licensing: Some users find the need for separate licenses for different features to be a disadvantage.
Cost for Advanced Features: Advanced features like CI/CD integration and Visual Testing require a paid license.
Mobile Execution Issues: There have been reports of instability during mobile test execution, where sessions unexpectedly close.
High Resource Usage: Users with less powerful hardware have experienced performance issues, indicating the platform may require substantial system resources.
Lack of Support for Legacy Systems: Katalon currently does not support automation testing for legacy Java UIs, which can be a limitation for some organizations.
Limited TestOps Analytics: The free version has limitations on the analytical results available through TestOps, pushing users towards the paid version for full functionality.
Separate Licensing for Cloud Features: Features like Parallel Cloud Execution and Cloud Tunnelling require additional licensing, which can increase costs.
Limited Free Features: Some users feel that the most valuable features are locked behind the paid version, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or individual users.
Hardware Demands: The platform’s demand on hardware resources can lead to slower performance on less capable machines.
No Bundled Packages: Users would prefer bundled packages for the various Katalon products to simplify licensing and possibly reduce costs.
– Occasionally, web applications fail to launch on Internet Explorer (IE 11), indicating compatibility issues.
– Customer support experiences have been inconsistent, with some users finding it difficult to get clear answers and technical assistance.
– Aggressive sales tactics have been reported, leading to a negative experience for some customers.
– Pricing discrepancies and lack of clear communication regarding costs have been a concern, resulting in customer dissatisfaction.
– The user experience (UX) could be improved, especially for beginners; suggestions include having different modes for novice and expert users.
– The onboarding process, while praised for being quick and easy, could potentially be further optimized for new users.

Pricing Overview of Katalon and BitBar

Katalon Pricing Summary

Katalon’s pricing model is structured to accommodate a range of user needs, from small teams to large enterprises. The platform provides a free Starter Plan, which includes basic test automation features suitable for small teams or those new to test automation. The Premium Plan, at $167 per month when billed annually, caters to more professional needs with advanced testing capabilities. For organizations requiring enterprise-level services, Katalon’s Ultimate Plan offers a custom pricing arrangement. Annual billing comes with a discount of up to 25%, and package deals are available for combined licensing and testing needs. Katalon emphasizes a comprehensive approach to quality management across various testing types, such as web, API, mobile, and desktop, and incorporates AI and visual testing options.

BitBar Pricing Summary

BitBar, offered by SmartBear, also presents a flexible pricing strategy tailored for different user requirements. The Live Testing plan is priced at $39 per parallel per month with annual billing and includes unlimited testing minutes and users, access to desktop browsers, real mobile devices, and advanced debugging tools. The BitBar Unlimited plan, at $177 per parallel per month on an annual basis, extends the offering to include unlimited automated testing minutes and additional features. Enterprise clients can benefit from a customized plan that includes dedicated devices and private cloud options, with pricing available upon request. BitBar also supports the Open Source community with free access to the platform and provides all users with a 14-day free trial.

Comparing Pricing Models

Common Points:

  • Flexible Pricing: Both Katalon and BitBar offer flexible pricing models designed to cater to various team sizes and testing requirements.
  • Annual Discount: Each service provides a discount for customers who choose annual billing over monthly payments.
  • Free Options: Katalon has a free Starter Plan, while BitBar offers free access for Open Source projects.
  • Enterprise Customization: Both platforms have a provision for enterprise customers that require a customized solution, which is priced individually.
  • Testing Capabilities: Each platform supports a range of testing types, including web and mobile.

Key Differences:

  • Pricing Structure: Katalon uses a tiered pricing model with distinct plans (Starter, Premium, Ultimate), whereas BitBar’s pricing is based on the number of parallels used per month.
  • Free Trial: BitBar offers a 14-day free trial for all plans, while Katalon does not explicitly mention a trial period for its paid plans.
  • Open Source Support: BitBar provides free access for Open Source projects, which is a specific community support initiative not mentioned by Katalon.
  • Plan Features: Katalon’s paid plans differ in features and capabilities, with more advanced features unlocked at higher tiers. BitBar’s plans differ primarily in the scope of testing minutes and parallel testing capacity.
  • Additional Discounts: Katalon mentions special discounts for new customers on their initial licenses, a promotional aspect not highlighted by BitBar.

Through this comparison, readers can understand that while both Katalon and BitBar offer scalable pricing models designed for a range of user needs, there are distinct differences in how the pricing is structured, the type of discounts offered, and the approach to free trials and Open Source community support.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.